CertOutlook
Methodology
CertOutlook
menu
Side-by-side career matchup

Radiology Technologist vs Licensed Practical Nurse

Stepping up from Radiology Technologist to Licensed Practical Nurse is a classic healthcare ladder move. We ran the numbers on when the extra months of school pay for themselves and when they don't.

Who makes more?

Radiology Technologists earn more — a $80,110 national median vs $64,400 for licensed practical nurses, a $15,710/yr gap.

What the day actually looks like

A Radiology Technologist’s day is procedure-driven, focusing on technology and patient positioning for brief, distinct imaging exams like X-rays or CT scans. They work with physicians to ensure diagnostic image quality. An LPN’s shift involves continuous, hands-on patient care, from administering medications and monitoring vital signs to wound care, often for multiple patients at once. LPNs typically report to a Registered Nurse, managing a broader range of ongoing patient needs.

Where each role is actually hiring

Demand for Radiology Technologists is concentrated in hospitals—which employ about 60% of them—and outpatient imaging centers. Vacancy rates are high for specialized roles like CT and MRI technologists. LPN hiring is strongest in skilled nursing facilities, long-term care, and home health settings, which are the largest employers of LPNs. While some hospitals have shifted hiring toward RNs, demand for LPNs remains robust in outpatient clinics and correctional facilities.

If you start as a Radiology Technologist today

Transitioning from a Radiology Technologist to an LPN requires completing a separate practical nursing program, which typically takes 12 to 14 months. While some general education credits may transfer, the core clinical training is distinct and does not usually have a direct bridge. The more common advancement for a Rad Tech is specializing in other imaging modalities like MRI or CT. Conversely, an LPN can pursue an LPN-to-RN bridge program to advance their career.

Sources cited (13)

payments Salary

Radiology Technologist median
$80,110
Licensed Practical Nurse median
$64,400

Who earns more?

Radiology Technologists earn $15,710 more per year at the median. That's roughly $1,309/month before taxes — a gap that compounds over a career but needs to be weighed against any difference in training time or upfront costs.

State-by-state pay

State Radiology Technologist Licensed Practical Nurse Gap
California $121,260 $79,750 +41,510
Washington $102,090 $83,150 +18,940
Massachusetts $103,620 $80,220 +23,400
Oregon $102,290 $80,470 +21,820
Alaska $98,920 $80,800 +18,120
District of Columbia $102,770 $75,740 +27,030
Hawaii $101,700 $71,140 +30,560
New Jersey $95,000 $75,160 +19,840
Arizona $89,200 $77,070 +12,130
Connecticut $91,970 $73,690 +18,280

checklist Requirements at a glance

Factor Radiology Technologist Licensed Practical Nurse
Typical time 2 years 1-2 years
Est. total cost — —
Exam ARRT Radiography Examination NCLEX-PN
License required Many states Most states
Education Completion of an accredited radiologic technology program Completion of a state-approved practical nursing program
CE hours / cycle 23 hrs 22 hrs

Barrier to entry

Timeline differs: Radiology Technologist typically takes 2 years, while Licensed Practical Nurse takes 1-2 years.

trending_up Job market

Radiology Technologist growth
+4.3%
Licensed Practical Nurse growth
+2.6%
Annual openings
Radiology Technologist: 12,900
Licensed Practical Nurse: 54,400
Radiology Technologist AI exposure
Low -0.56
Licensed Practical Nurse AI exposure
Low -0.51

Market outlook

Growth projections are similar — Radiology Technologist at +4.3% and Licensed Practical Nurse at +2.6%. If market size matters to you, Licensed Practical Nurse is the larger field: about 54,400 openings annually against 12,900. That gap shows up most clearly in smaller metro areas where the narrower profession may have zero open positions in a given month.

flag Bottom line

Radiology Technologist pays $15,710/year more at the national median. Over a 10-year career, that's roughly $157,100 in gross earnings — though Radiology Technologist may require more training upfront.

Clock time to credential: 2 years for Radiology Technologist, 1-2 years for Licensed Practical Nurse. Your answer to 'is the longer path worth it' depends mostly on how much your current income replaces what you'd earn while in school.

Frequently asked questions

Which pays better: radiology technologist or licensed practical nurse? expand_more
Radiology Technologist has the higher median at $80,110/year. Licensed Practical Nurse comes in at $64,400.
Which certification takes more effort: radiology technologist or licensed practical nurse? expand_more
It depends on the metric — Radiology Technologist requires 2 years of training, Licensed Practical Nurse needs 1-2 years. State-level exam pass rates add another layer of comparison.
Is it common to transition from radiology technologist to licensed practical nurse? expand_more
Switching is possible and fairly common in this field. Expect to complete additional training and pass a separate exam — some prior credits may carry over depending on your state.
Which has better job prospects, radiology technologist or licensed practical nurse? expand_more
The BLS projects +4.3% growth for Radiology Technologists compared to +2.6% for Licensed Practical Nurses through 2034. However, Licensed Practical Nurse has more annual openings overall.
Is licensing required for radiology technologists and licensed practical nurses? expand_more
Licensing varies: roughly 86% of states license Radiology Technologists, compared to 100% for Licensed Practical Nurses. Your state's rules are what ultimately matter.

Explore each career

Moving states? Check license reciprocity

More comparisons

source Sources

See our full methodology for data refresh schedule and known limitations. Updated 2026.